Joshua Mostafa

…As the demands of capital and the relentless ideology of corporate media hem in the scope of democratically elected politicians to differ substantially from each other, personality and identity become the surrogates for real political debate. Celebrating Australia’s first woman prime minister is fine, but let’s not delude ourselves about how much difference it makes. For myself, growing up in the UK under a Thatcher government erased any illusions I may have had – as the anonymous writers of the The Coming Insurrection put it, ‘patriarchy survives by attributing to women all the worst attributes of men’. In the 2008 Democratic primaries in the US, Clinton’s tough talk of ‘obliterating’ Iran was an attempt to deflect sexist stereotypes and prove that she had – as her loyal follower James Carville put it – the ‘testicular fortitude’ to be an effective commander-in-chief.

[ read the whole post at Overland ]

In the wake of Synthetic Genomics’ dramatic achievement, ‘playing God’ was the predictable cry in the media. The verb is misleading. It implies that whereas God works, Venter and his colleagues are merely playing; a blasphemous mockery, the trifling mimicry of a monkey, carrying out the form of creation while missing its content of the original – the ineffable master plan, the solemn and mysterious ways in which He moves.

In fact, the comparison between this human achievement and the processes that led to the existence of the human species would be better understood in the reverse. Not just human evolution, but the series of events that led to the conditions in which the emergence of life was possible – the distance of the Earth from the sun, the gravitational pull of the moon steadying our orbit – are contingent on an interplay of factors of immense complexity. This cosmic dynamic, if we are to anthropomorphise it, would be more aptly described as whimsy than as work; or, the better to appreciate its radical difference from human activity, as the kind of explosive creativity we witness in storms and volcanoes. What we have done in synthesising life is to copy the effect of that play by means of diligent work.

[ read on at Overland ]

Despite the fact that Philosophy is the highest-rated subject at Middlesex, and one of the strongest in the country, management have decided to shut the department down, without even the pretense of an appeal to any objective standards. This is a clear and unambiguous example of the profit motive’s destructive effect on academic excellence; an end result of the meddling in higher education by New Labour philistines.

The campaign to the save the department can be found here. The online petition against the department’s closure has already gathered over ten thousand signatures.

The consumer-choice model of democracy tends to encourage the same behaviour from political parties as from corporations: marketing, branding, advertising and other forms of mendacity, which in turn generate cynicism and a distaste for the political system – a deserved distaste. Honesty and principle are punished; the scum rise to the top. The expenses scandal was just the straw that broke the camel’s back. Ordinary people don’t like politicians, don’t trust them, don’t respect them. Nor should they.

[ read the whole post at Liberal Conspiracy ]

Some of us, disillusioned by other charismatic and supposedly transformational leaders (Tony Blair, in my case) or philosophically predisposed to see the changing of the guard at the top of the capitalo-parliamentarian state apparatus as a charade, did not expect much. But to the starving, a crust is a feast, and after eight years of intransigent climate denial, war crimes, atrocities, profiteering and the privatisation of war, Obama’s emollient rhetoric was music to the ears of many on the Left. Who can blame them? Once installed in office, however, as Guardian columnist Gary Younge noted at the time, ‘the issue is no longer what he is and means, but what he does’. Sarah Palin, of all people, posed the unavoidable question: ‘How’s that hopey, changey stuff working out for ya?’

[ read on at Overland ]

We all remember the end of last year for the dismal outcome, at Copenhagen, for concerted international action to deal with the world’s problems. Just a few weeks before, however, another meeting took place. In November last year, the International Encounter of Left Parties met in Caracas. At that meeting, Hugo Chávez, in typically theatrical style, declared that it was time ‘to convene the Fifth International, and I dare to make the call, which I think is a necessity’.

What would a Fifth International look like? More of the same Trotskyist rhetoric, or something new and radical that, while rejecting the neoliberal consensus, does not tie itself up in dogma, recognising that all theory is contingent – that nineteenth-century critiques of capital, however brilliant for their time, are not the be-all and end-all?

[ read on at Overland ]

The father of structuralism, Claude Lévi-Strauss, has died a few weeks before reaching his 101st birthday. From his obituary:

Dans une époque pressée, confuse, massivement portée à la veulerie et au simplisme, l’homme passait fréquemment pour distant. Tous ceux qui eurent la chance de l’approcher peu ou prou savent combien cet esprit universel, profondément attaché à la dignité de tous peuples, savait être proche, amical, fidèle et chaleureux, surtout si l’on avait su tenir le coup sous son regard, le plus acéré qui fût. Hautain? Non. Seulement exigeant, suprêmement intelligent, et peu enclin au mensonge. Cela fait évidemment beaucoup de défauts, surtout si l’on est en outre l’auteur d’une des oeuvres majeures du XXe siècle. Dans la cacophonie de l’heure, une partition exemplaire. Et l’élégance altière, à côté du solfège, d’un musicien de l’esprit.

‘This is not England, Mr Rahman,’ said Sajid firmly. ‘The people here are not educated. We do our best to improve things, but we face a mountain of ignorance and a swamp of superstition. They are confused. They don’t know what they want. This is a fine city, but its people are still mountain folk at heart. They will believe any claptrap their tribal elders tell them; and the elders are stuck in the past. There are power hungry mullahs too who want to cause trouble. That’s why there has been so much strife over the last two years. No, Mr Rahman, you will not learn anything from the poor muddle-headed people out there.’ He gestured beyond the high fences, barbed and electrified, that cut the palace off from the rest of the city…

My story ‘Meeting the Colonel’ will be published in March as part of this year’s Sketch, an annual collection of fiction, poetry, art and digital design.

Once people have had a taste of a proper public healthcare system, they won’t give it up. It’s a one-way street. In the UK, which is in general more closely aligned to the politics of the US (a neoliberal consensus on the centre right) than the mainstream of Europe, the NHS is the one public service on which the political classes dare not ravage with market fundamentalism.

[ read on at Liberal Conspiracy ]

Never mind the Federation’s code of non-interference or whatever it’s called. The fact is that the Federation starships zoom around the galaxy armed to teeth. Of course the enemy fires on them first; that’s the standard justification for militarism, an external threat that must be defeated. This is not unusual in Hollywood, but something like Star Trek, that has at least pretensions to belonging to the canon of speculative fiction, it is not unreasonable to hold it to a higher standard. Kirk’s father drives his starship into the enemy: he ends his life as a suicide bomber. You can’t get much more militaristic than that.

[ read the whole post on my tech blog ]